Accessibility

Use Ally and the Canvas Link Validator to check for accessibility issues in your Canvas courses. The bottom of this page has more info and tutorials. There are some issues they may miss, however (see below). First, let’s look at accessibility more generally.

Why is Accessibility Important (and the Law)?

All students should have equal, barrier-free access to college and course materials. The goal of full course accessibility is for all students to be able to interact with course content and engage with the instructor. Accessibility is a legal requirement, and there are ethical and pedagogical reasons for making your courses accessible, as well.

Integrating accessibility into online course materials is crucial for fostering an inclusive and equitable educational environment. While it may initially appear as an additional task, the importance and necessity of ensuring that all course materials are accessible to every student cannot be overstated. Below are the ethical, legal, educational, and professional imperatives for making online course content accessible.

Ethical Responsibility

Providing equal learning opportunities is a fundamental ethical duty for educators. Accessibility is not merely a technical requirement; it is a matter of fairness and justice. Students with disabilities deserve the same opportunities to succeed as their peers. Ensuring that educational materials are accessible guarantees that all students, regardless of their physical or cognitive abilities, can fully participate in their education. This commitment to inclusivity reflects core educational values of equity and respect (Burgstahler, 2020).

Legal Obligations

Educational institutions must comply with legal mandates such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act (Section 504), which require equal access to educational opportunities for all students (U.S. Department of Education, 2021). Non-compliance can lead to significant legal repercussions, including lawsuits and loss of federal funding. Ensuring accessibility protects institutions from these risks and underscores a commitment to legal and ethical standards.

Enhanced Learning for All

Accessibility benefits the entire student body, not just those with disabilities. The principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) advocate for creating materials that accommodate a wide range of learning needs, thereby improving the learning experience for everyone (CAST, 2018). For instance, captions on videos assist not only students with hearing impairments but also non-native English speakers and those who prefer to read along while listening. Clear, well-organized documents aid in comprehension and retention for all students. Ultimately, accessible materials lead to better teaching and learning outcomes for the entire classroom (Rose & Meyer, 2002).

Quality of Education

Accessible course materials often result in higher-quality content. Striving for accessibility encourages educators to pay greater attention to clarity, organization, and usability. This focus enhances the overall effectiveness and engagement of teaching materials (Tobin, 2014). Additionally, accessible courses can reach a broader audience, including lifelong learners, working professionals, and international students, thereby extending the impact and reputation of educational programs.

Professional Growth

Embracing accessibility is a valuable opportunity for professional development. Learning to create accessible materials and incorporating UDL principles can enhance teaching skills and increase versatility and effectiveness as an educator (Scott, McGuire, & Shaw, 2003). These skills are increasingly in demand and can differentiate educators in a competitive academic environment.

Misconceptions About Accessibility

Here are some common arguments and misconceptions against making online courses accessible for students, along with refutations for each:

1. It’s Too Expensive

Misconception: Making courses accessible requires a significant financial investment that institutions cannot afford.

Refutation: While there may be initial costs associated with making online courses accessible, the long-term benefits far outweigh these costs. Accessibility ensures that more students can participate in and complete courses, potentially increasing enrollment and retention rates. Additionally, many accessibility features, like using proper HTML tags or providing text descriptions, are low-cost or free.

2. It Takes Too Much Time

Misconception: Making courses accessible is too time-consuming for instructors and course developers.

Refutation: While integrating accessibility features can take time initially, many practices, such as using accessible templates or tools, can streamline the process. Once instructors become familiar with accessibility guidelines, the additional time required becomes minimal. Moreover, accessibility improvements often benefit all students, not just those with disabilities. Artificial Intelligence tools can greatly speed up making course materials accessible.

3. Only a Few Students Benefit

Misconception: Accessibility improvements are only necessary for a small percentage of students, so the effort is not justified.

Refutation: Accessibility benefits a wide range of students, including those with temporary disabilities, non-native speakers, and students with different learning preferences. Universal design principles enhance the learning experience for everyone, not just those with documented disabilities.

4. Technical Complexity

Misconception: Making online courses accessible is too technically complex and requires specialized knowledge that educators may not have.

Refutation: There are many resources, tools, and training programs available to help educators and developers learn how to make their courses accessible. Many learning management systems (LMS) have built-in accessibility features, and there are guidelines like the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) that provide clear instructions.

5. Lack of Awareness

Misconception: Educators are not aware of accessibility issues, so it’s not a priority.

Refutation: Increasing awareness through training and professional development can quickly elevate the importance of accessibility. Once educators understand the impact of accessibility on student success, they are more likely to prioritize it in their course design.

6. Fear of Reducing Course Quality or Creativity

Misconception: Accessibility requirements will stifle the creativity and quality of the course content.

Refutation: Accessibility does not hinder creativity; it often enhances it by encouraging innovative approaches to content delivery. Accessible design encourages the use of multiple formats and flexible options, which can lead to more engaging and inclusive courses.

7. Accessibility Features Will Be Misused

Misconception: Students without disabilities will take advantage of accessibility features, leading to unfair advantages.

Refutation: Accessibility features are designed to level the playing field, not to give any group an unfair advantage. Furthermore, these features can support a diverse range of learning styles, which benefits the entire student body.

8. It’s Not a Legal Requirement

Misconception: There are no legal requirements to make online courses accessible.

Refutation: In many regions, including the United States and European Union, there are legal requirements for educational institutions to provide accessible learning environments. Non-compliance can result in legal consequences and damage to the institution’s reputation.

9. Misunderstanding of Accessibility Scope

Misconception: Accessibility is only about adding captions or transcripts.

Refutation: Accessibility encompasses a wide range of considerations, including website navigation, screen reader compatibility, visual design, keyboard accessibility, and more. It is about creating an inclusive learning environment that considers various needs and preferences.

10. Perception of Accessibility as an Afterthought

Misconception: Accessibility can be added after the course is created, if needed.

Refutation: Accessibility should be integrated from the beginning of course design. Retrofitting accessibility features can be more challenging and costly than incorporating them from the start. Proactive design ensures that all students can access the content without delays or additional barriers.

References

  • Burgstahler, S. (2020). Creating Inclusive Learning Opportunities in Higher Education: A Universal Design Toolkit. Harvard Education Press.
  • CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org
  • Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. ASCD.
  • Scott, S. S., McGuire, J. M., & Shaw, S. F. (2003). Universal design for instruction: A new paradigm for adult instruction in postsecondary education. Remedial and Special Education, 24(6), 369-379.
  • Tobin, T. J. (2014). Increase online student retention with universal design for learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 15(3), 13-24.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2021). Office for Civil Rights Annual Report to the Secretary, the President, and the Congress. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/ocr/index.html

How to Fix Accessibility Issues in Your Canvas Course

Short link to printable handout: bit.ly/checkaccessibility | Video walkthrough

How to Prevent Accessibility Issues in Your Canvas Course

Anthology Ally

Ally is a tool for proactive accessibility that integrates with Canvas. Ally helps build a more inclusive learning environment and improve the student experience by helping faculty take clear control of course content with usability, accessibility, and quality in mind.

Limitations of Ally

Some things Ally doesn’t catch include:

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

HCC Teaching Guide (Draft) by Hillsborough Community College is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Feedback/Errata

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *